Prev: [FT] Questions from a new-ish-bee Next: Re: Active vs Passive

Re: Active vs Passive

From: Popeyesays@a...
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:23:57 EDT
Subject: Re: Active vs Passive

In a message dated 4/13/00 2:18:56 PM Central Daylight Time, 
ChrisD@jubileetech.com writes:

<< 
 Oh, you were clear--my point was, it's worth it to spend 30 points or
 whatever so you can triangulate NOW and without burning thrust.  CTs
and SCs
 weren't originally designed to be missile bait.
 
  >>

Absolutely they were designed as patrol and picket platforms so why not
use 
them as such!


Prev: [FT] Questions from a new-ish-bee Next: Re: Active vs Passive