Re: B5 style drives
From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:02:00 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: B5 style drives
On 20-Mar-00 at 16:15, Oerjan Ohlson (oerjan.ohlson@telia.com) wrote:
> Roger Books wrote:
>
> >We've been toying with the idea of going to B5 style drives, and
> >what we're looking at is as follows.
> >
> >A drive costs 4% of the mass of your ship +3% per thrust.
>
> [examples snipped]
>
> >Any thoughts?
>
> 1) How do you handle thrust-1 engines? Are they halved when damaged,
or
> do they go down completely (as a single thrust-1 engine does in the
> published rules)?
>
> 2) Multiple engine modules take more DCP rolls to repair when they're
> damaged.
>
> Regards,
>
> Oerjan Ohlson
> oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
We've been playing with the numbers and it looks like 5% fixed +
3% per thrust point.
Thrust 2 4 6
Drives
1 11% 17% 23%
2 16% 22% 28%
3 --- 27%* 33%
4 --- 32% 38%**
*assumes one thrust 2 and 2 thrust 1s
** assumes two thrust 2s and 2 thrust 1s
A single drive goes down when it fails a threshold. You have no thrust.
If you have two drives and they both go down it would take two
repair rolls to bring them back up. If you have 3 drives and all
three go down then three repair rolls. Your single drive destroyers
gain 7%, 2 or 3 mass, which is worthwhile. Your two-drive bigger
ships lose a bit at thrust 4 and gain a bit at thrust 6. The numbers
might still need to be tweeked.
Roger