Re: [OT] Ideologies, was Re: Starship Troopers (was RE: Mission to Mars)
From: "Scott Case" <tgunner@h...>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 06:38:28 PST
Subject: Re: [OT] Ideologies, was Re: Starship Troopers (was RE: Mission to Mars)
<snips some stuff, plus the interesting x-y axis>
I guess that is part of the 'article', but since it's up, it deserves
some
comment.
>Don't be fooled into thinking that
>Conservatives are anti-statits, they may want to dismantle
>the Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare, but they
>would strengthen the police and army.
Mmmm... being a 'conservative' I have to say this isn't very accurate.
SFMS,
I prefer the government being as small as possible and as involved in
'affairs' as little as possible. That would include the police (which
should
be as local/regional as possible) and the military (large standing
armies
are expensive and not necessary). In other words- keep it if you REALLY
need
it, loose it if you don't ;)
I'm kinda curious about what political parties would exist in the
Anglican
Confederation and how they would interact in whatever system of
government
the Confederation uses. Has anyone discussed this before?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com