Prev: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor Next: Re: Was re: RFACS but diverging into philosophic ramblings about future tech...

Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

From: Tom Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:53:36 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

> On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca wrote:
> 
> > Unless the AFV has an on-boar fire supression system in the engine
bay.

oh, are we crossing over with the using-GW-cavalry thread here? i wasn't
aware boars had engine compartments in need of fire suppression :).

tom

Prev: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor Next: Re: Was re: RFACS but diverging into philosophic ramblings about future tech...