Prev: Re: FT: High Energy Turns (ala SFB) Next: Re: What? No way...

Re: HBW. My input +

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 20:52:13 -0800
Subject: Re: HBW. My input +

>I always cringe a little (a lot) when people talk about weapon
>efficiencies as compared with other weapons in a given wargame.
>FLAVOR and STYLE are much, much more important than whether the HBW is
>.626% +/-  less efficient than a P-torp.  Why not have only Basic Beam
>Weapons?  That way everything is as efficient as everything else
>differing only in name.  The NSL uses "Phased Plasma Ejectors" while
>the NAC uses "Synchronized Laser Mounts" etc.	You get my point.

Agreed. However, we do have to use some sort of statistical comparison
to
make sure things are balanced.

Schoon

Prev: Re: FT: High Energy Turns (ala SFB) Next: Re: What? No way...