Prev: Re: Tanks vs. APCs Next: Re: [SG2/DS2] Infantry Walker design rules

Re: Binary Propellant Guns

From: Ryan M Gill <monty@a...>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:21:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Binary Propellant Guns

On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Thomas Barclay of the Clan Barclay wrote:

> 4: Go to an autoloader (it's about time).

Tankers generally hate the idea of an autoloader because if it caughs up

during a battle you are screwed. 

Another bigger consideration is that an autoloader can't drive the tank 
if the driver gets injured, it can't help repair a track or help 
retension it, it cannot sit out at an OP during a lull and chat on the 
sound powered telephone with the Platoon LT about the 4 BTRs it sees 2 
kliks away at the crossroads. Loaders (the human kind) are critical in 
daily life of keeping the tank healthy and performing duties other than 
pulling a sabot round from the ammo bin and shoving it into the gun's 
hungry mouth. 

The addition of an Auto loader would require a major amount of
rethinking 
general tanker doctrine and operations from day to day. 

------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill	  NRA / DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@turner.com	    I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 	     www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
- '85 Honda CB700S  -  '72 Honda CB750K  - '76 Chevy MonteCarlo  -
------------------------------------------------------------------
-  No more limits on the 2nd amendment. Enforce the extant laws  -
------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Prev: Re: Tanks vs. APCs Next: Re: [SG2/DS2] Infantry Walker design rules