Prev: Re: FT: tactics vs a slow mover with high arcs Next: Re: [FH] SARCo

RE: "Average" FT ship size?

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:19:18 +1100
Subject: RE: "Average" FT ship size?

500 points per turn seems about right to replace fleet losses, if combat
can
occur every turn.  Downgrade this appropriate if the average combat is
further apart.

Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
[mkw] Admiral Peter Rollins; Task Force Zulu
[pirates] Prince Rupert Raspberry; Base Commander

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Lipsett [SMTP:translation@intercomltd.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 12:37 PM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	"Average" FT ship size?
> 
> Does anyone have any data on what an "average" ship costs in FT? I am
> trying to set up some campaign rules, and it would be nice if an
> "average" cost coulid be used to judge roughly how many ships a player
> should be able to build (except the stomp'em gang, of course...)
> 
> Thanx
> 
> Edward Lipsett
> Fukuoka, Japan
> elipsett@intercomltd.com


Prev: Re: FT: tactics vs a slow mover with high arcs Next: Re: [FH] SARCo