Re: A good altitude for Ortillery? Math and astrophysics guys help out
From: RWHofrich@a...
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:53:50 EST
Subject: Re: A good altitude for Ortillery? Math and astrophysics guys help out
In a message dated 11/30/99 4:30:08 PM Eastern Standard Time,
kaladorn@fox.nstn.ca writes:
> Given:
> 1) Geosynch is roughly 22,000 km (if I'm not way off base)
> 2) Given geosynch is stationary wrt a point on the earth
> 3) Given a lower orbit will be (of necessity) faster? I think
> 4) Given the lower the orbit, the faster the orbit - so the further
> off geosynch, the less time you'll be able to see a given point on
the
> earth before going out of arc
>
Item number 4 assumes that the vessel is in stable orbit--in other
words, not
using its propulsion system (whatever it may be) to stay up. With the
systems available in the FT universe (the GZG-verse?), that is not
really a
valid assumption--no one seems to worry about reaction mass, so running
your
thrusters continuously over a few hours isn't a problem.
Rob