RE: SG2: GMS vs Power Armor
From: "Glover, Owen" <oglover@m...>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:45:15 +1000
Subject: RE: SG2: GMS vs Power Armor
Yep, another interpretation that has been worried over like a dog's
bone!
Still, I did like a previous House Rule that someone was using that
allowed
the GMS/P to be used against a single PA trooper. Something along the
lines
of resolving the hit as Brendan describes but then you resolve damage as
per
a vehicle hit ie Minor Success is d12 Imp vs PA Armour level and Major
Success doubles Imp vs PA Armour.
Only one figure can be a casualty in the squad and that hit figure is
determined randomly. I personally like this but it is a House Rule
approach
and needs to be played with that in mind.
Owen G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robertson, Brendan [mailto:Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 1999 10:15 AM
> To: 'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'
> Subject: RE: SG2: GMS vs Power Armor
>
>
> See: Heavy Weapons vs Infantry, SG pg:40.
> Infantry are size 1 targets, usually with no ecm; so it's
> FC+Q vs d4 ecm die
> using d8 impact.
>
> Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
> [mkw] Admiral Peter Rollins; Task Force Zulu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ted@naxera.com [SMTP:ted@naxera.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 10:42 AM
> > To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> > Subject: SG2: GMS vs Power Armor
> >
> > Just finished a game. My opponent was using his infantry's
> GMS/P aqainst
> > my PA. Is this okay? It felt right, but I know GMS can't
> be used against
> > infantry.
> > -Ted
> > ____________________________________
> > sent from a PalmVII over ThinAir
> > www.thinairapps.com
>