Re: anti fighter missiles

>From: Roger Books <books@mail.state.fl.us>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>Subject: Re: anti fighter missiles
>Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 11:41:53 -0500
>
>Dowd wrote:
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nathan rolfe <ace_hole@hotmail.com>
> > To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
> > Date: Saturday, 6 November 1999 3:45
> > Subject: Re: anti fighter missiles
> >
> > >Just another idea. Basically a missle salvo that acts like a
fighter 
>group,
> > >bassicaly launched like a normal salvo group. They have 3 combat 
>endurance
> > >factor move in same phase as fighters have a movement rate of 24"
use a
> > >combat endurance factor each turn and may do a 12" secondary burn
like
> > >normal fighters. In the salvo/fighter attack phase each missile can

>attack
> > >one fighter group, each salvo rolls 6 dice and all damage is
resovled 
>as
> > >normal figters they also do the same against ships. once they have 
>attacked
> > >they are removed from the table. mass and cost the same as normal 
>missiles.
> > >They are launched from normal launch systems.
> > >If you made any sense out of that lot please comment. this might be

>play
> > >tested tommorow.
> > >
> > >Nathan
> > >
> > >
> > Its a little powerful....maybe if they were restricted to
MASS-intensive
> > Salvo Missile Racks, rather than Launchers....
>
>I don't really think it's that bad, notice they don't do the damage of
>a salvo missile, it looks like up to 6 dice of _beam_ damage.	They
have
>1/2 the CE of a fighter group and they never get a second shot, unlike
>fighters.
>
>Roger

Hello

all damage is exactly like beams against ships and they can still be
shot 
with PDS so any damage against ships will be pretty low. There will be
no 
other types of missiles eg/No interceptors attack etc..

nathan

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com