Prev: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced? Next: Re: [FT] .....bloody fighters

RE: anti fighter missiles

From: "Nathan rolfe" <ace_hole@h...>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 18:56:08 PST
Subject: RE: anti fighter missiles



>From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>To: "'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'" <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
>Subject: RE: anti fighter missiles
>Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:31:58 +1100
>
>The only problem is, how do you resolve movement orders?  Neither
fighters
>nor SMLs use written orders.
>If the SMLs are placed first, the fighters can automatically avoid
them, or
>conversely, if the fighters move first, the SMLs automatically hit.

The way you can do this is by using fighter initiative and count each 
missile group as a fighter group thus taking it in turns moving and
placing 
each individual fighter and anti-fighter missile group.

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Prev: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced? Next: Re: [FT] .....bloody fighters