Prev: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced? Next: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced?

RE: anti fighter missiles

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:54:12 +1100
Subject: RE: anti fighter missiles

No, you use the salvo similar to energy armament.  Nominate the target
then
resolve PDS fire.  That's why there are no autokills from the missiles.

'Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
[MKW] - Admiral Peter Rollins - Task Force Zulu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laserlight [SMTP:laserlight@quixnet.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 1:45 PM
> >Each antifighter SML salvo can target a single fighter group in range
> (or
> >split between groups, 1 group per firecon).	The salvo supplies 6 PDS
> die to
> >fire at the target (or split amongst targets), but must be within
> range and
> >arc during the fire phase.  Against ships, it is resolved as PDS with
> the
> >same range & arcs as the SML launcher.
> 
> Errr, did you leave out the part about "resolve movement"?


Prev: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced? Next: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced?