Prev: RE: [FT] Scenario Question Next: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced?

RE: anti fighter missiles

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:52:57 +1100
Subject: RE: anti fighter missiles

That's actually a reversion to the old FT rules, which I was surprised
that
it wasn't officially brought across to FTFB.

'Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
[MKW] - Admiral Peter Rollins - Task Force Zulu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan rolfe [SMTP:ace_hole@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 1:49 PM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	RE: anti fighter missiles
> 
> 
> I is only an idea at the momment and my major reason for this missle
type
> is 
> that peole are comming along with 15+(you know who you are) fighter
groups
> 
> and as i don't like using them i wanted a way to attack them before
they 
> actually reached my ship. One idea i came up with was to allow ships
with 
> area defens fire control to shot at fighters withing 6" of them even
they 
> are not attacking.
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Prev: RE: [FT] Scenario Question Next: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced?