Prev: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced? Next: RE: anti fighter missiles

Re: anti fighter missiles

From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@q...>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 21:45:12 -0500
Subject: Re: anti fighter missiles



>The only problem is, how do you resolve movement orders?  Neither
fighters
>nor SMLs use written orders.
>If the SMLs are placed first, the fighters can automatically avoid
them, or
>conversely, if the fighters move first, the SMLs automatically hit.
>
>How about something along the lines of the antimissile system I use
for
>Honor Harrington?
>Each antifighter SML salvo can target a single fighter group in range
(or
>split between groups, 1 group per firecon).  The salvo supplies 6 PDS
die to
>fire at the target (or split amongst targets), but must be within
range and
>arc during the fire phase.  Against ships, it is resolved as PDS with
the
>same range & arcs as the SML launcher.

Errr, did you leave out the part about "resolve movement"?

Prev: Re: [FT] Who said Nova cannon's were unbalanced? Next: RE: anti fighter missiles