Prev: Re: Underwater questions [ot] Next: Re: Comments on various designs - New Bavarians, Dean's reinforcements, Independent Antarctics

Re: Underwater questions [ot]

From: Steven M Goode <gromit+@C...>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 18:03:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Underwater questions [ot]

Excerpts from mail: 3-Nov-99 Re: Underwater questions [ot] by Beth
Fulton@marine.csiro 
>  
> >Thus airplanes and submersibles are fundamentally different, and I
doubt
> >you could make a very effective vehicle that operated both in the air
> >and the water unless you've got exotic technology (like anti-grav).
>  
> Actually I was thinking the shapes of animals that work well in both -
I'm
> definitely not an engineer and thus must rely on what's closer to
home,
> thus I was very impressed to see that the Japanese engineers have
finally
> decided to trial subs that act (move) like fish ;)

What animals work well in both air and water?  Water and land, sure; but
air and water?
>  
> >Yes, I'm a mechanical engineering student; no, I don't like fluid
> >mechanics at all. :) 
>  
> It has its moments ;)
>  
A few.	Control systems are much more fun (feedback! feedforward!
lag-lead! PID! state-space!  woo hoo! :P 


Prev: Re: Underwater questions [ot] Next: Re: Comments on various designs - New Bavarians, Dean's reinforcements, Independent Antarctics