Re: Underwater questions [ot]
From: DracSpy@a...
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 11:24:17 EST
Subject: Re: Underwater questions [ot]
In a message dated 11/2/99 6:33:48 AM Pacific Standard Time,
gromit+@CMU.EDU
writes:
> > >5) What is the best shape for a lander desgined to move though the
air
> and
> > >go into the water?
> >
> > Hydrodynamics and aerodynamics share an awful lot in common due to
the
> > basics of fluid dynamics. Just remember to give it stabilisers so
it
> > doesn't go into a spin once in the water.
> >
>
> Yes and no.
>
> Water differs from air in two major ways that impact what you're
discussing:
> -Buoyancy
> -Density/viscosity
>
> In air, a plane must support itself through lift. This means that
the
> plane must be light, strong, and have a large wing surface.
>
> In water, a vehicle is supported vertically through buoyancy. In
order
> to move through the water at a reasonable speed, it needs to have a
> small cross-section with nothing that will snap off due to the drag
on
> the vehicle (like wings).
>
> Thus airplanes and submersibles are fundamentally different, and I
doubt
> you could make a very effective vehicle that operated both in the air
> and the water unless you've got exotic technology (like anti-grav).
>
> Yes, I'm a mechanical engineering student; no, I don't like fluid
> mechanics at all. :)
Would an Aerobraking system work?
-Stephen