RE: Attack vs. MultiRole
From: "Moody, Danny M." <DMoody@b...>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:37:12 -0500
Subject: RE: Attack vs. MultiRole
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Imre A. Szabo [mailto:ias@sprintmail.com]
>
> The US Army had some problems with this when they introduced
> the M2 and M3
> Bradely's. In the early training exercises the "more
> survivable" M2/3's died
> faster and more often then the M113's they replaced. Why?
> Because the crews
> were picking fights with MBT's... I'm not sure how or if the
> US Army resolved
> this situation.
The only way how - training, training, training. Just because you
*look*
like a tank doesn't mean you *are* a tank.
-- vargr1 UPP-8D9B85 --
The three principle virtues of a good programmer |
dmoody@bridge-dot-com
are Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris. | vargr1@jcn1-dot-com
** Omnia dicta fortiora, si dicta latina. **