RE: SML's, PDAFs and Banzai Jammers/Escorts
From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@d...>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:08:21 -0400
Subject: RE: SML's, PDAFs and Banzai Jammers/Escorts
I assume that you mean:
Mass 3 Mass
1 PDF 1
Thrust 6 1
No-FTL <<< 0
Hull 1 1
Minimum (armed) FTL ship is mass 4.
Mass 4 Mass
1 PDF 1
Thrust 6 1
FTL <<< 1
Hull 1 1
-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://fly.to/fullthrust
-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan E and Carmel J Brain [SMTP:aebrain@dynamite.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 12:06 AM
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re:SML's, PDAFs and Banzai Jammers/Escorts
>
[snip]
> What's the smallest effective FTL ship? I would suggest:
>
> Mass 3
> 1 PDF
> Thrust 6
> FTL
> Hull 1
>
> ie one of the shrapnel. A PDF gives a minimal anti-ship capability (ie
> can be used effectively vs unarmed targets), and as a bonus, a minimal
> anti-fighter capability.
>
[snip]
> --
> http://www2.dynamite.com.au/aebrain
> aebrain@dynamite.com.au <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
> | Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
> | Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
> abrain@cs.adfa.edu.au o O*OO^^^^OO*O o oo oo oo oo
> By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
>