Re: Affectiveness of FSE BDN?
From: "Peter Forsythe" <pforsythe@h...>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 10:01:37 PDT
Subject: Re: Affectiveness of FSE BDN?
Hullo all
>Played at lunch yesterday against NAC and really felt my BDN
>was extremely inaffective.
>
I agree. I don't think the group I play with has quite figured out the
FSE
in general and the BDN just does not cut it anyway we've sliced it so
far.
The BDN seems to be the ultimate 'compromise' ship. It lacks sufficient
launchers to be an effective SML ship. It lacks sufficient beam weapons
( 1
class 3 on a BDN ?!?) to slug it out and one fighter sqdn is not much of
a
threat. Its fast, but I can't figure out where to manouver it to.
Again it
seems that the FSE ship excels at running away :-)=
>My side:
>
>FSE BDN
>FSE CH
>FSE DS (Super Destroyer).
>
>Opponents
>
>NAC CVL
>2xNAC Escort Cruiser (CE?)
>
Two ADFC equiped ships does make it very tough to punch a hole through.
Try
the scenario again with only on ADFC equiped ship and see how it goes.
>
>The CVL sat back out of the combat most of the game, leaving me
>the 2 CE's to fight. I managed to put all SML's on target every
>time, but 2 interceptors and ADFC on the CE's made this pointless.
>As far as affectiveness went I felt the CH was much more affective
>than the BDN as it had 2 SML launchers, 2 on the BDN and I could
>probably have saturated defenses and landed a few missles. My
>opponent apparently agreed as he targetted my CH with all his fighters.
The FSE CH is a very impressive ship. My personal fav of the FSE fleet.
Peter
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com