Prev: Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99)) Next: Re: Railgun: Branching technologies

Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99))

From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 09:11:06 +0200
Subject: Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99))

Kenneth Winland wrote:

>	Thanks to the FASA v. Hasbro, precedent has been laid down.  In
> the words of the judge "...a robot is a robot, a spaceship is a
> spaceship....".  The result was that FASA had no case because even
though
> a number of toys were almost exact copies of some of their Battletech
> designs, they were not *exact* copies.

How did the GW-vs-Demonworld case go? The models were certainly close
to one another, but not identical.

Curious,

Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry

Prev: Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99)) Next: Re: Railgun: Branching technologies