Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99))
From: Laserlight <laserlight@c...>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 19:36:13 -0400
Subject: Re: Legal Stuff (was: [OFFICIAL] FALLOUT 4 (June 99))
>
>I think you'd have a tough time arguing that (for example) the GZG Star
Tiger
>isn't a Starfury, or our 'Fighter with Hex Solar Panels' wasn't a TIE.
I
must
>admit I'm not an expert in copyright law so I don't know exactly where
the
lines
>can be drawn,
The unofficial but generally agreed on view is "stand back five feet and
squint". If they look the same, they're close enough to start a suit.
A
Lara Croft figure or similar would be more arguable since there are
quite a
few women in the world who might have been used by your designer, but a
not-TIE-fighter would be kind of difficult to defend. I suppose the big
boys could recover all your profit from whatever of those designs you've
ever sold, if they were really motivated, but a "cease and desist" is
more
probable. I hope you're incorporated, so you are not personally as well
as
corporately liable?
but I would guess that we're on pretty thin ice. Plus Eidos, Lucas
>etc would be able to line up a huge array of expensive lawyers, so we'd
never be
>in a position to contest the issue anyway. Hopefully it'll never come
to
that :-)
>
>Tony
>
>
>
>