Re: The GZG Digest V1 #287

Scott Spieker <scspieker@fiberstream.net> wrote:
> Now on to a different but related topic.
>What about dreadnaughts or other 'fighting' machine that is not
necessarily 'large' enough to qualify as a vehicle?  For example, a
horde
of orcs may have a vehicle with no armor. Would you attack the crew
directly as though they were a 'unit' rather than using the vehicle
rules?
	If you've got anti-personel weapons, attack the orcs. If you've
got
anti-vehicle weapons, attack the vehicle.

>Would then a GMS or other 'vehicle killer' be able to fire at that
vehicle
effectively since there is no armor?
	It must be very easy to destroy, since its armour dice is very
small.

> Along the same lines, what about power armored units (terminators or
SGII
PA troops).  Are they 'hard' targets for anti-vehicle weapons?
	One could treat them that way. One missile = one PA trooper
kill. It
depends on how agile you visualise your anti-vehicle missiles are and
how
agile your PA or Terminators are.
	For the smooth, quick and fast looking PA made by GZG, I would
say that
they can dodge most anti-vehicle fire or duck.
	For the slow moving, immobile Terminators of 40K, I would say
that they
can be hit easily by even primitive anti-vehicle weapons.

Andrew Martin
Al.Bri@xtra.co.nz
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Online @ 33,600 Baud!