Re: [FT] Sensor range question

>
>> Maybe instead of +3", make it +10% of
>> actual range?  Suggestions?
>
>that's a bit too complicated. why not +1 mu at 0-12, +2 mu at 12-24, +3
at
>24-36, etc? that range refers to the real, physical range.

Jeez, moving a decimal over one place is too complex?