Re: OU/NAC- Hawaii?

Nathan Pettigrew wrote:

> The take over of Hawaii was more of an annexation than outright
invasion, as
> the US was falling apart.
> A large Japanese descended population and the promise of law and order
might
> have made Japanese control attractive.  Of course, not _everyone_ will
like
> it.

_Exactly_ the case. There was widespread rioting, many people were being
killed, Japanese businesses being burnt, and someone in the Diet
extracted their finger in time to (at the behest of the Hawaiian
Governor) send some Self Defence Forces to restore order and protect
civilians of all nationalities.
A later Plebiscite gave a very narrow majority to Anschluss. It wasn't
even fixed (much), so there was no widespread opposition, everyone was
just glad that some form of order had been restored.

-- 
	      http://www2.dynamite.com.au/aebrain 
aebrain@dynamite.com.au     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain|	    xxxxx	Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia |	xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
 abrain@cs.adfa.edu.au o O*OO^^^^OO*O o oo     oo oo	 oo  
		       By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale