Prev: Re: [FT] Japanese Next: Re: [FT] Japanese

Re: Armor vs shields?

From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:57:03 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Armor vs shields?

On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

> a) Screens can go down due to treshold checks - on average, a system
> goes down when the ship has lost 67-70% of its hull boxes (armour
> doesn't count here!). The probability for this is fairly easy to
> calculate, but screens can also come back *up* thanks to the DCPs

hence the small print on the Winchester Energy Systems MS-200e:

"Warning! The value of your investments may go down as well as up."

sorry.

Tom

Prev: Re: [FT] Japanese Next: Re: [FT] Japanese