Prev: Re: [FT] A thought on that vector movement problem Next: Re: [FT] A thought on that vector movement problem

Re: [FT] Playtest of Fulton's MT Missile rules proposal

From: Samuel Reynolds <reynol@p...>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:42:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT] Playtest of Fulton's MT Missile rules proposal

>Sean Bayan Schoonmaker wrote:
>
>> What I'm worried about is an "eggshell" mounting three missiles, say:
>> 
>> Mass 20 Missile Boat:
>> 
>> Fragile Hull, 2 MASS, 4 POINTS
>> FTL Drives, 2 MASS, 4 POINTS
>> Thrust 3, 3 MASS, 6 POINTS
>> 1 FireCon, 1 MASS, 4 POINTS
>> 3 EMP Missiles, 12 MASS, 36 POINTS
>> 
>> 54 POINTS
>> 
>> Three of these babies can take down our SDN "in a vacuum," at 162
points.
>
>But if you use the "need 1 FC per missile" proposal, you need another
24
>pts at least. And are "fighter fodder", very vulnerable to any fighter
>groups coming your way. So you need an escort, ie yet more points.
 
I'd vote for one FC per missile target. So 5 missiles at 1 target
need 1 FC, but 5 missiles at 5 targets need 5 FCs.
 
- Sam
________________________________________
Samuel Reynolds
Spinward Stars: http://www.spinwardstars.com/
Reynolds Virtual Workshop: http://www.primenet.com/~reynol
reynol@primenet.com
samuel_reynolds@csgsystems.com


Prev: Re: [FT] A thought on that vector movement problem Next: Re: [FT] A thought on that vector movement problem