Prev: RE: Damage Program for many Batteries Next: Re: OT was Re: [DSII] Reactive armour

Re: [FTFB] Rules Clarification

From: Alan E & Carmel J Brain <aebrain@d...>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:58:43 +1000
Subject: Re: [FTFB] Rules Clarification

Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

> Up to 6. FT specifies this squadron size; FB doesn't change it (and we
> haven't discussed any change either); BUT there's no printed
restriction
> on having squadrons initially *smaller* than 6 craft. IMO there should
be
> one, since 3 squadrons of 2 fighters each are *much* more resistant to
> defensive fire than 1 squadron of 6 fighters, not to mention how good
6
> fighters operating independently are. They are also a book-keeping
pain,
> but most rules-lawyers are prepared to take the book-keeping to get
that
> extra combat edge :-/

Unless you're playing with Fighter Morale rules...

-- 
aebrain@dynamite.com.au     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain|	    xxxxx	Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia |	xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
 abrain@cs.adfa.oz.au  o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo     oo oo	 oo  
		    By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale

Prev: RE: Damage Program for many Batteries Next: Re: OT was Re: [DSII] Reactive armour