Prev: Re: [FTFB] More on Fighter Bays and Hangers . . . Next: Re: [FT] SMLs, Type 3 & Tactics

Re: It's gone OT! Re: [FT] Unbelievably BIG ship

From: Donald Hosford <hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 02:02:09 -0500
Subject: Re: It's gone OT! Re: [FT] Unbelievably BIG ship



devans@uneb.edu wrote:

> Sorry, Donald, I didn't make myself clear. I'm having some
difficulties
> with Lotus Notes on being able to reply with PARTS of relevant posts.
I
> just meant a discussion on Saddam Hussein and his activities, without
a
> particular scenerio in mind, the way SFB had a Falklands scenerio,
would
> have been too rough to handle.
>
> My own take on superships, while they've been mentioned in FT and MT,
is
> that they, like super guns, and movement plotted from way off-table,
may be
> pushing the system outside it's design parameters.
>
> On the other hand, I'm still gonna run those three Superior SGD's
against
> regular ships with some very special rules. We're suppose to push,
prod,
> experiment, and stretch. I have Jon's word on it. ;->=
>
> The_Beast
>

hehe  I always thought we were Supposed to run the wheels ofen it!  8D 
It
tells Jon what needs to be fixed next!

Donald Hosford

Prev: Re: [FTFB] More on Fighter Bays and Hangers . . . Next: Re: [FT] SMLs, Type 3 & Tactics