Prev: Re: Plastic Models and Acrylics. Next: Re: Plastic Models and Acrylics.

RE: [SG] A couple of questions

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:34:23 +1100
Subject: RE: [SG] A couple of questions

1.	Check the rulebook. Walkers ignore suspension hits.

2.	Either ignore it, or count it as a lucky richochet.

'Neath Southern Skies
http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
*****
T'was brillig, & the slithy toves,
Did gyre & gimle in the wabe.
All mimsy were the borogroves,
And mome raths outgrabe.
		       - Lewis Carroll "Through the Looking Glass".

-----Original Message-----
From:	Glover, Owen [SMTP:oglover@mov.vic.gov.au]
Sent:	Tuesday, December 15, 1998 10:18 AM
To:	'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'
Subject:	[SG] A couple of questions

A couple of questions for the wizened crowd.

On the weekend we played a game involving tanks and walkers.

How have people been dealing with Non-Penetrating hits with:

a.	Walkers; firstly, what do people use for the Suspension die for
Infantry Walkers. I'd imagine that teh vulnerability of the walkers may
be
greater than tracked wheeled or hover. Then again, perhaps we should
simply
use the armour die as the legs make up approximatly one third of target
mass
and may already be considered in the hit/miss die roll???

b.	How are people dealing with hits on a vehicle hull down or dug
in.
Seems to me that, again, Suspension hits on Non-Penetrating Hit results
should either be re-rolled or dismissed as non-applicable.

Any comments?

Owen G


Prev: Re: Plastic Models and Acrylics. Next: Re: Plastic Models and Acrylics.