Prev: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure of the NAC (really long) Next: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure

Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure

From: "John M. Atkinson" <john.m.atkinson@e...>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 00:08:27 -0800
Subject: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure

Adrian Johnson wrote:

> I've had the same kind of thoughts, though from a distance, myself. 
You
> know, the Governor of one state doesn't like what the Governor of the
state
> over is doing, calls out the National Guard, etc...  I've always
wondered
> how far a State Governor could go.

The legal answer is "His State's Borders".  Assuming the Federal
Government doesn't need us at the time (Supreme Court case in 1990
settled this--Federal orders take priority over state), then the
National Guard can be deployed on the Governor's orders anywhere in his
state.	Unfortunately for him, this means he has to pay us out of State
funds.	Most states can't afford to do this for an extended period of
time (Drill pay, Annual Training, and Federal mobilizations, we get paid
out of the same funds teh Real Army is), so it kind of limits what he
can do other than in a real emergency.

John M. Atkinson


Prev: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure of the NAC (really long) Next: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure