Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure of the NAC (really long)

Let's not go there, John...

Jared

"John M. Atkinson" <john.m.atkinson@erols.com> on 12/11/98 04:29:08 PM

Please respond to gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU

To:   gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
cc:    (bcc: Jared E Noble/AAI/ARCO)
Subject:  Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the
      structure of the NAC (really long)

Adrian Johnson wrote:

> South East Region - the Virginias, Tennessee, the Carolinas, Georgia,
> Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana???

I believe someone suggested that most of these formed a "Confederacy" or
something which fought hard against the US/UK forces and held them off
long enough to negotiate a certain amount of autonomy and hence direct
entry as the Confederacy.

> Florida - direct entry 'cause of majority Hispanic population, and it
> doesn't quite fit "the South"

Depends--the Panhandle is very much Old South.

> Great Plains Region - Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, the Dakotas, Minnesota,
> Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah (?) tho' maybe Utah goes in
the
> South West...

Utah would be uninhabited after someone solved the question of the "Free
Republic of Deseret" with a nuclear weapon.  I'm not sure whether to
include a similey--this would be the simplest answer.

John M. Atkinson