RE: (FT) Kra'Vak FTFB Mass - Right ones this time..
From: "Tim Jones" <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 12:56:07 -0000
Subject: RE: (FT) Kra'Vak FTFB Mass - Right ones this time..
Steven wrote:
>I have come to the conclusion that my first sets of numbers were
>incorrect. The corrected numbers are listed below.
>
>Scout 7 mass
>Corvette 18 mass
>Frigate 24 mass
>Destroyer 35 mass
>Lt. Cruiser 55 mass
>Escort Cruiser 64 mass
>Heavy Cruiser 90 mass
>BattleCruiser 110 mass
>Battleship 134 mass
>BattleDreadnought 157 mass
>SuperDreadnought 248 mass
>Strike Carrier 230 mass
>
I'd be interested in the rationale behind these numbers.
Why did you choose these values and why were you unhappy
with the other set? Looks like a reasonable starting point,
though the biggies seem bit heavy compared to say NAC?
12 Arapaho
18 Minerva
24 Tacoma
30 Ticonderoga DD
50 Huron CL
64 Furious CE
80 Vandenburg CA
106 Majestic BC
120 Victoria BB
140 Excalibur BDN
190 Valley Forge SDN
140 Inflexible CVL
200 Ark Royal CV
-= tim jones =-