Prev: RE: [SG] Scenario with engineers Next: RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Changes

RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Changes

From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 22:02:15 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Changes

On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, Robertson, Brendan wrote:

> No.  KV armour shouldn't affect missiles or PT damage.
> It can be argued that missiles & PTs simply 'eat' their way through
> armour and hull alike.  With nuclear or fusion missiles, the extra
mass
> can 'feul' the reaction whereas PTs could be a mini-fusion
> reaction/plasma reaction or matter/antimatter shot (depending on
> preferance)  that 'eat' any energy directed at them (all that random
> energy should overload or bypass any energy defences).
> 
> It mostly depends on how you view the actual attack technology.
> 
Brendan,

Correct me if I am mistaken, but Human Beam batteries are a development
or
offshoot of particle accelerators? Regardless of what you call them -
Phaser, lasers, particle project cannons, fusion cannons - they are all
energy weapons designed to eat armour, hull and anything eles that gets
in
their way. If Kra'Vak armour acts like energy shields, when hit by Human
beams, whos to say, that they don't also act like nuclear dampers, or
have
other special features..

Steven

Prev: RE: [SG] Scenario with engineers Next: RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Changes