Prev: Re: [GZG][FH] Planet types (was Re: Locations of Stars) Next: Re: Review of mailing list FTGZG-L

RE: [FT] FB Kra'Vak

From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 08:22:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: [FT] FB Kra'Vak

On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Tim Jones wrote:

<kra'snip> 
> You may well be right about the armor rating
> 34 boxes does seem excessive.
> 
> Also on web site you are using completely different RG mechanic
> and general weapon costings than the latest 'schoon' system, isn't
> this more than slightly modified? (namely RG cost and SG mass/cost).
> 
> tim jones
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> 

Tim,

We are looking at the armour rules now, I have noticed that this system
could be misused and the armour boxes could get out of hand real quick..

SA

			       Steven Arrowsmith
			  www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
			     steven@arrowsmith.net
			      dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______

		    I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
			 Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______

Prev: Re: [GZG][FH] Planet types (was Re: Locations of Stars) Next: Re: Review of mailing list FTGZG-L