Re: GEV capabilities
From: Tony Christney <acc@q...>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 16:50:24 -0800
Subject: Re: GEV capabilities
At 12:13 AM 11/18/98 -0000, you wrote:
>On 16 Nov 98, at 17:50, Tony Christney wrote:
>
>> Let's see...
>>
>> Let's say that an HKP/5 fires a non-rocket assisted 4kg projectile
>> at 3000m/s (Mach 9.1, I believe that that is quite a bit faster than
>> current tech...).
>>
>> If the GEV vehicle firing is 60 tonnes, then the velocity of the
>> tank after firing (assuming it was initially stationary) would
>> only be 0.2m/s=0.7km/h. Now, most tanks will have recoil damping
>> through the use of hydraulics, so this could be reduced even more.
>>
>
>I think that you will find that due to conservation of momentum that
>recoil damping does not alter the overall change in velocity of the
>tank, it serves to make the force act more weakly for a longer
>period, rather than massively all at once, and tearing the gun off the
>mount.
DOH!
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Richard Slattery richard@mgkc.demon.co.uk
>This is unparalyzed in the state's history.
> Gib Lewis, Texas Speaker of the House
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
Tony Christney
acc@questercorp.com
"If the end user has to worry about how the program was
written then there is something wrong with that program"
-Bjarne Stroustrup