Prev: Re: IFVs, was Re: Supertank? Next: Re: Supertank?

Ekranoplan was Re: GEV capabilities

From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:44:24 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Ekranoplan was Re: GEV capabilities

On Tue, 17 Nov 1998, Adrian Johnson wrote:
> Tom Anderson big fool, he write:
> >not quite; it still has the advantage of the ground effect, which
makes
> >flight far easier than in the free-flight regime.

> Well, almost.  This is maybe straying a bit far from the point of the
list,
> but the "ground effect" in "ground effect vehicle" (al la hovercraft)
is
> different from the "ground effect" which makes flight more efficient
close
> to the ground.

ah. i'll stick to power armour in future ... i seem to remember that the
ground effect applies to helicopters, but that must be the aircraft
edition of the ground effect; that'll teach me to generalise.

> Where this gets interesting is with the development of transport
vehicles
> designed specifically to use the aerodynamic aspects of "ground
effect".

okay, hands up all brits who saw the Equinox on channel 4 all about
these!

we saw the soviet effort, called an Ekranoplan, which was the first one,
and invented by the guy who invented the hydrofoil (sort of), plus a US
effort using soviet engineers and german and japanese efforts too. the
germans are way ahead here - their design is far cleverer and cheaper.

>  research that the Soviets used in the '80s to develop a
> military transport version of this type of craft.  Theirs was BIG (I
think
> roughly equiv. in size to the cargo capacity of a Hercules
transport?????).

it was huge. it was one of the most amazing things i have ever seen -
totally incredible. it had a huge bank of engines for takeoff, but once
it
was going it just needed two little ones. far more efficient than a
plane.

>  It was part of a tech. development program for this technology.  I
believe
> the objective was eventually to design craft big enough to have the
> carrying capacity of small transport ships, but with speeds similar to
> aircraft (say, carry 1000 tons at 140 mph across the Bering
strait...).

i think they got up to a few hundred tonnes. there was also an SSM
version
for use against ships; fly in under radar, launch, turn around and
outrun
most of your pursuers. amazing stuff.

there is one more ekranoplan in the works - bigger than all the previous
ones. however, it may never be completed.

> The Soviet craft had jet engines, and was supposedly successful.  I
don't
> remember what the results of the program were - certainly we don't see
the
> tech used anywhere

the design bureau that made them has gone commercial - you can buy them.

> See any applicability in the GZG universe for this technology?

in ds2, when mobility types of riverine craft are discussed, it is
written
that they may be (and i paraphrase) "convetional hovercraft, Rigid Side
Wall hovercraft, WIG (Wing In Ground-effect) machines or even small
hydrofoils.". a WIG machine is exactly what we are talking about here.

>  Giant
> "ocean going" transports using efficient "ground effect" lift to carry
> armoured formations.	If you could figure out how to set one of these
down
> on land (be a drag to need a 10k foot runway to land and take off),
there's
> no reason why they wouldn't work over land - doesn't require water,
just
> easier to take off and land on water.

the soviets used theirs as an amphibious assault vehicle, with the
ability
to go rather further than just the beach ...

Tom

Prev: Re: IFVs, was Re: Supertank? Next: Re: Supertank?