Prev: Re: Space crews and solar flares. was Re: Space carrier fighter philosphyRe: ADLER TAG AAR Next: Re: ADLER TAG AAR (and now some background) [OT] [HIST]

Re: [DS and SG] Regiments of the Crown

From: Tony Wilkinson <twilko@o...>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 10:38:56 +0100
Subject: Re: [DS and SG] Regiments of the Crown


	I think that all the regiments would be assigned local names
where they
are not given titles like the Prince of Wales' own Texans or whatever.
The
Canadians still do this I think, anyone? The Brits have always been
strong
on regimental history so they would keep old numbers and titles where
possible. Obviously those units that opposed the British take over won't
be
reformed under the NAC.

	Tony.
	twilko@ozemail.com.au

At 09:37 23/10/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Here is a question, how is the Army of the Confederation organized?
Does it
>use a version of the British Regimental system?? How do American and
>Canadian units fall into this. The U.S. does use a Regimental system of
its
>own, but our regiments are numbered (with nicknames). I wonder how this
>would work...
>
>Typical U.S. Regiments:
>16th Infantry (dates back to the Civil War) Regular
>34th Armor (WWII) Regular
>7th Cavalry (At least Civil War) Regular
>
>
>Would Infantry Regiments be assigned a region and given a 'local' name:
>
>16th Infantry- say in North Alabama and Tennessee- The Nashville and
>Knoxville Rifles??
>34th Armor: 34th Royal Tank Regiment??
>7th Cavalry: Her Majesty's American Cavalry Regiment? Or... The Garry
Owen
>Dragoons!
>
>What do ya'll think??
>
>
>

Prev: Re: Space crews and solar flares. was Re: Space carrier fighter philosphyRe: ADLER TAG AAR Next: Re: ADLER TAG AAR (and now some background) [OT] [HIST]