Prev: Anti-ship PDS Fire (Was Re: Ship/Crew Experiance Pt I) Next: Re: [FT extra rules]

Re: [FT extra rules]

From: John and Roxanne Leary <realjtl@s...>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 18:51:29 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT extra rules]

Mike.Elliott@bull.co.uk wrote:

> >Guys,
> >	Just to keep the discussion alive, try a VERY simple solution.
> >Escorts are -1 (to hit) targets.
> >Cruisers are 0 (to hit) targets.
> >Capitals are +1 (to hit) targets.
> >Superships over 100+ mass are either +1 or +2, as you like it.
> 
> >Just a thought,
> >John L.
> 
> You seem to be assuming FT2 here, not FB. The FB does away with the
> Escort/Cruiser/capital distinction and some larger ships mass over 200
but
> are not Superships.
> 
> Mike Elliott
> 
Mike, 
     You are correct, I do think in FTII terms.   But the concept
is still valid, just the names/ship size need to be redefined to 
allow for personal taste/bias.

Bye for now,
John L.


Prev: Anti-ship PDS Fire (Was Re: Ship/Crew Experiance Pt I) Next: Re: [FT extra rules]