Re: RE:[FT] Some House rules for comment (SFB universe)
From: "chadtaylor" <chadtaylor@d...>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 16:47:29 -0400
Subject: Re: RE:[FT] Some House rules for comment (SFB universe)
>
> Don't forget the photons are SLM's suggestion as well(with
> more ammo)
>
I'm thinking of a Torp that does beam damage with normal/prox
(spread)/overload functions.
A disruptor with a normal/overload function and a dedicated 'special'
firecon to allow increased long range fire. Looking for that 'Klingon
sabre dance'. :)
> With your shield suggestions how to you mark this off on the
> SSD, it all becomes quite messy after several hits & regens?
>
> tim jones
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----
>
You don't have to use damage repair. I don't think that it would make a
large difference if you decided not to use damage repair on shields.
But,
SFB has some repair of shields and you see that sort of thing in the
series
so I thought 'why not'. If it is too much of a mess to manage it then
that
would be a good 'why not'. Haven't playtested the shield/armor thing so
I
really don't know. It is the point shield (limited arc) that I'm
wondering
about balance with - too much/little?
Chad