Prev: Re: [MISC] [OT] Bring and Battle Next: Re: [MISC] [OT] Bring and Battle

Re: [MISC] [OT] Bring and Battle

From: Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@c...>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 18:18:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [MISC] [OT] Bring and Battle

Mike.Elliott@bull.co.uk wrote:
> Anyhow, if the nub of the problem is that you want an easy way to put
> together a quick game, then why not do what commanders have to do in
real
> life? In SGII the player is at most in the role of a company commander
> (more usually a platoon commander). He has the troops he has been
given. No
> more, no less. He MIGHT get some support assets if higher thinks he
needs
> them and they are available, but it all depends.

	This can be a justification for the classic method
	of scenario construction:

	Player A designs the scenario.
	Player B gets to pick which side they play.

	( from the classic method of evenly dividing a
	piece of pie, Sally divides it and Davy
	gets first pick )

-- 
  /_\	WINCHELL CHUNG	 Nyrath the nearly wise at the Praeternatural
Tower
 <(*)>	nyrath@clark.net	 
http://www.clark.net/pub/nyrath/home.html
/_/|\_\ ABSIT INVIDIA VERBO					IDEM
SONANS
 //|\\ 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SURREAL SAGE SEZ: Never use a long word when a diminutive one will do.


Prev: Re: [MISC] [OT] Bring and Battle Next: Re: [MISC] [OT] Bring and Battle