Re: FB designs and SLMs
From: "Darryl Adams" <darryl_adams@o...>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:21:03 +1000
Subject: Re: FB designs and SLMs
The problem is that in many comps do not allow mods or varients. Thus
making
the NAC really strong against the SML system (with all their ADAF), and
the
ESU really poor. The FSE have miltable fighters, so this is not such a
problem (they can have fighter screens), but a French fleet will
proberbly
always loose against a NAC fleet, th reason is point defence.
Darryl
-----Original Message-----
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@gzero.dungeon.com>
To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk <FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk>
Date: Thursday, September 10, 1998 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: FB designs and SLMs
>Some very interesting battle reports coming in here, good to see how
the FB
>is shaping up with repeated use. Can I just reiterate one point - the
FSE
>and ESU DON'T lack ADFC ships just because they are not listed in the
FB!!
>The FB designs are examples only, and almost all classes will have
minor
>variants in service - in the case of heavier escorts and cruisers this
will
>almost certainly include some ADFC variants, you just have to do the
mods
>yourselves. Want AD cover for your ESU fleet? Ditch some offensive
weapons
>off a Voroshilev and stick an ADFC and a couple more PDS on!
>
>:)
>
>Jon (GZG)
>
>
>
>