Prev: Re: FT Political Geography w/ B5 Wars hexless vs EFSB? Next: [DS2]GEVs and TDs

Re: FT Political Geography

From: Tony Wilkinson <twilko@o...>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:47:15 +0100
Subject: Re: FT Political Geography


	I really don't think that things will be as neat as Schoons map.
It might
fit for major areas of control but I think within those you are likely
to
find bubbles (pockets, ballons, sectors etc..) of space controled by
another power or even a small nation like, heaven forbid, the Irish :).
An
area might be nominally ESU space, but there might be 3 or 4 systems
that
were under NAC control. A nice point to form up a fleet for a deep
strike
into enemy territory. The map for the expansion campaign has a lot room
for
overlapping areas of control. Such areas make for high tensions and lots
of
combat.
	Thats my 2 cents worth.

	Tony.
	twilko@ozemail.com.au

At 08:36 31/08/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Hello. In order to see this map right, you should view it in Courier,
or
>some other rigidly spaced font.
>
>This is my opinion (roughly) of how the various major/minor nations
might
>be laid out. As it's only two dimensional, it leaves a little bit to be
>desired. The sizes of the chunks give a rough approximation of the
nation's
>holdings (except that core and inner colonies are too big - whaddayah
want
>from a text map!)
>
>I put it in this format so everybody could give it a look and tell me
where
>I screwed up ;-)

Prev: Re: FT Political Geography w/ B5 Wars hexless vs EFSB? Next: [DS2]GEVs and TDs