Prev: What happened???? Next: Re: UN Ship Nomenclature

RE: UN Ship Nomenclature

From: Niall Gilsenan <ngilsena@i...>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 12:43:30 +0100
Subject: RE: UN Ship Nomenclature

At 00:13 07/08/98 -0500, you wrote:
>If I go as small as caves & swamps (Pripet Marsh notwithstanding), I
could 
>probably name every ship the UNSC could ever launch after geographical 
>features in Indiana alone.  Atmittedly, that'd make for a boring fleet 
>(Cornfield 0117, please tighten up formation).  And I didn't want to
make 
>up a bunch of Sec-Gens - and the UN probably wouldn't supply me with a
KIA 
>list (Could we start with Korea and that 'Sorry About Your Rangers'
bit?). 
> I'll go back to the atlas and see if anything comes to mind.

The actual UN casualty list for the last 50 years isn't that high at
1,551
and that includes non military personal too.  Perhaps ship names could
be
successfully completed missions?

UNSC Congo? UNSC Liberia? UNSC El Salvador?  Theres a list of them at
the
UN site 

http://www.un.org

The names may be a little uninspiring but then the UN never really has
any
victories only the leftovers of other peoples mess.
--------------------
Niall Gilsenan,
DIT Cathal Brugha St,
Dublin 1,
Ireland.

ngilsena@indigo.ie
--------------------
The miscellany (Sci-Fi combat games)
http://members.tripod.com/~Cwintel/Scifi.html


Prev: What happened???? Next: Re: UN Ship Nomenclature