Re: Gravity, Tech & others (was Re: Orbits, etc)

On 10 Jul 98 at 18:27, Samuel Penn wrote:

> You could always make it 'random' - i.e. based on complicated
> criteria which don't need to be explained, but which allow you
> to put the points in interesting positions.
> 
> On the one hand, it means you have to have some way to agree
> before a scenario where points are, which is fair to both sides.
> 
> On the other hand, it avoids any PSB.
> 
> On the gripping hand, it means you can have a scenario where
> the only alder^H^H^H^H^Hjump point in a system is inside the
> outer shell of a red supergiant...

You Motie you ;) I thought the term 'Alderson point' was familair ;)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Richard Slattery	     richard@mgkc.demon.co.uk
I don't think anyone should write his autobiography until after he's
dead. 
     Samuel Goldwyn 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~