RE: NAC units, was Odd FT Idea
From: jatkins6@i... (John Atkinson)
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 21:03:54 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: RE: NAC units, was Odd FT Idea
You wrote:
>Hmm.. Depends on your capability to /apply/ that much larger economic
muscle. We've n >had this arguement before, but just to make a
>colonies to a degree. Doesn't matter that you have a much more
powerful economy if >trade is next to nil. Doesn't matter if you have
a bigger Navy if the nearest ship is 3 >weeks travel away. Unless you
I guess it all comes down to how interconnected is your interpretation
of the background. In mine, based on the number of convoy escort
scenarios, there's a lot of trade, and tight-knit nations with strong
central governments. But YMMV, and from the prior discussion the list
is pretty well spread from one extreme to the other. It's a matter of
taste. As for me, I like playing convoy escort scenarios (it's so much
more interesting than Fleet A flys at Fleet B and they try to bash
eachother into the ground) so I'm going to write my background so they
are frequent. :)
John