Re: Troop Capacity
From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@n...>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 21:53:54 +0200
Subject: Re: Troop Capacity
Jerry Han wrote:
> Yeah, this has always kind of bothered me as well. Basically,
something
> that was the size of a battleship could only carry a combat company?
> This implies that starships are extremely volume inefficient. Now,
you
> can argue anything you want (after all, it's a game! (8-) ), but I
guess
> I read Starship Troopers too many times, (or maybe Crusade (8-) )and
want
> the ability to drop entire divisions if necessary.
Um... if you've read the same Crusade (ie, Weber's) as I'm thinking of,
well... those marine forces were pretty small :-/ The TFN battleships
carried about 100 - 120 marines each; superdreadnoughts around 300 -
350.
I'd call that a company or three, but hardly an entire regiment. To drop
an entire division, you'd need several troop transports - or the huge
fleets assembled towards the end of the war (like 38 SDs and 23 BBs
<g>).
> Hmmm. Maybe a different multiplier for Cargo Space? If we use FB
> designs (which are roughly twice as massive for the same 'size'),
Should be "whose Mass unit is roughly half the size of the FT (basic
rules) Mass unit" :-/ (which, of course, isn't specified anywhere <g>)
But yes, that's the way to go.
Later,
Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@nacka.mail.telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry