Re: DS confidence checks
From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 14:31:14 -0500
Subject: Re: DS confidence checks
John spake thusly upon matters weighty:
> But under DS II rules, you can only loose two levels of confidence per
> check. I don't like that--it should be entirely possible to rout a
> platoon off the board if it takes 50% casualties in a few seconds-
> -including the platoon leader.
Firstly, I was under the impression DS2 turns were on the order of
minutes? But as this isn't germaine to the point, we'll ignore that.
I'd agree that it is entirely possible for a formation to be routed
within short order.
Interestingly enough, another thing morale rules tend to not handle
all that well is the tendency of men to do an ostrich - to hit the
deck, get behind cover, and do NOTHING and not respond to orders, not
move, etc. Most of our morale systems have them withdraw a distance
or until they rally. In reality, they might just freeze.
Morale is undoubtedly the most human, unpredictable and complex
aspect of such games as DS2 and SG2. Humans react in various ways -
soetimes fighting to the death over nothing other times routing in
defence of important points. Sometimes one casualty will route a
company, sometimes you have to kill every stinkin' one of them. The
best any set of morale rules can do is reasonably cover most
situations most of the time. Not cover all situations or work all the
time. That's too much to hope for (especially since this aspect of
human behavior is sort of unpredictable). Sometimes a crappy militia
unit will hang on to the last guy, and sometimes the elite paras will
punch out and didi real early on. All a morale system can do is
represent tendencies.
You want it to be possible to lose more than two morale levels, but
not commonplace. Maybe certain circumstances (either a certain loss
level or a certain number of checks you'd have to make as you passed
breakpoints) allow the loss of a greater # of morale levels. This
would represent single crushing events more accurately.
Just my 0.02.
Tom.