RE: Obstacles, Part 2
From: John Skelly <canjns@c...>
Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 16:31:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Obstacles, Part 2
It sounds similar to a Bangalore torpedo? Is that the case? Is it one?
If you're not sure what a bangalore is (maybe different terminology),
please let me know.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jatkins6@ix.netcom.com [SMTP:jatkins6@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 1998 2:10 PM
> To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: Obstacles, Part 2
>
> You wrote:
> >
> >Hey John
> >
> >Describe a Shock tube. I'm not sure what your referencing.
>
> Plastic tube lined with explosives. To quote the applicable manual,
> "The shcok tube is a thin, plastic tube of extruded polymer with a
> layer of special explosvie material (called HMX) deposited on its
> interior surface. This special explosive dust poroagates a detonation
>
> wave. The wae moves along the shock tube to a factory crimped and
> sealed blasting cap (which is moisture resistant). The detonation is
> normally contained within the plastic tubing. The shock tue offers
> the
> instantaneous action of electric initiation wihtout the risk of
> accidental initiation of the blasting cap (and the charge) by radio
> transmitters in the area, or by static electricity discarge. The
> shock
> tube medium is extremely reliable." (ST 5-250-1, Modernized Demolition
>
> Initiators, October 1997, US Army Engineer School)
>
> You Canadians probably won't see this for another decade or so--I've
> yet to get to use any live stuff myself. But the classes I've had on
> it have been fascinating. As you can see, they've only had it in
> service for a year and a half.
>
> John M. Atkinson