Kravak ship handling was Re: [?] Tournament Fleet Composition
From: Tony Wilkinson <twilko@o...>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:08:14 +0100
Subject: Kravak ship handling was Re: [?] Tournament Fleet Composition
John L (on a different topic) thought that how the Kravak
handled high G's
would be a matter of major interest to anyone who happened to capture
one
of their ships. What if they handle higher G's simply because of their
physiology? Heavier bone structure, multiple valves in the arteries
(like
our own wrists), higher blood pressure, major organs embedded in fat and
surrounded by a boney case (like a skull for the liver etc) and any
other
number of ideas that would make the race better able to survive major
trauma and injuries.
Tony
twilko@ozemail.com.au
At 18:34 22/04/98 -0700, you wrote:
>John Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> You wrote:
>>
>> >ships. Within those constraints, the fleets were fairly well
balanced.
>> We also >outlawed Kra'vak weapons.
>>
>> Curiosity: How would you feel about a human fleet that had a
captured
>> refitted Kra'vak ship with it? Only Kra'vak rules I used were
armored
>> hull-engines were damaged badly and rebuilt to human specs. It looks
>> pretty potent for it's size (I've been playing with Patrol Cruiser
hull
>> designs), but I havn't tested it.
>>
>> John M. Atkinson
>
>John,
> An alternate point of view of the engine rebuild.
>The engines are not any better than human due to the straight line
>acceleration value. The real change in the Kra'Vak ship is the
>ability of the crew to handle high-G turns, and whatever crew
>facilities this requires.
>
>Bye for now,
>John L.
>
>