RE: Kra'vak Railgun (ECM)
From: "John Fox [TEMP]" <John.W.Fox@E...>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Kra'vak Railgun (ECM)
Mike:
I looked at your statement. The question I have is what if the task
force has
two area ECMs. Does the area ECM add to each other or will they be
considered
to provide only up to a -1 result no matter how many there are in the
teask
force? Next question is what would the radius of coverage be.... 60",
48",
36"?
John
> X-ListName: Full Thrust Combat Game Mailing list
<FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk>
> From: Mike Wikan <MWikan@mailhost.accolade.com>
> To: "'FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk'" <FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk>
> Subject: RE: Kra'vak Railgun (ECM)
> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 10:31:05 -0700
> X-Priority: 3
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>
> The ECM affects the CARRYING ship. An area of effect ECM would provide
> radius coverage. Do not allow ECM effects to be greater than -2 on
> Railgun shots. This way, large ticket ships can afford to mount their
> own ECM suites AND shields while dedicated ECM Area of Effect cruisers
> can provide task group coverage at -1 as long as the ships are in the
> radius. It's simple and has the added benefit of utilising an unused
> system.
>